Selected Commentaries and Letters
- Does autogynephilia theory still provide a useful explanatory framework for understanding transfeminine identity and sexuality?(2026)(opens in new tab)
- Paraphilia is not a natural kind: Comment on Bailey and Hsu (2026)(opens in new tab)
- Gender assignment dysphoria in the DSM-5 (2014)(opens in new tab)
- Veale's critique of Blanchard's typology was invalid (2014)(opens in new tab)
- More evidence that societal individualism predicts prevalence of nonhomosexual orientation in male-to-female transsexualism (2013)(opens in new tab)
- Do some men who desire sex reassignment have a mental disorder? (2011)(opens in new tab)
- Further validation of Blanchard's typology: A reply to Nuttbrock et al. (2011)(opens in new tab)
- A validation of Blanchard's typology: Comment on Nuttbrock et al. (2010)(opens in new tab)
- Proposed revisions to gender identity disorder diagnoses in the DSM-5 (2010)(opens in new tab)
- Something resembling autogynephilia in women: Comment on Moser (2010)(opens in new tab)
- Erotic target location errors are easy to mischaracterize: A reply to Moser (2009)(opens in new tab)
- Transsexual groups in Veale et al. are "autogynephilic" and "even more autogynephilic" (2009)(opens in new tab)
- Shame and narcissistic rage in autogynephilic transsexualism (2008)(opens in new tab)
